1992. El Mariachi. Robert Rodriguez. $7,000.
1994. Clerks. Kevin Smith. $27,000.
1995. The Brothers McMullen. Edward Burns. $23,000.
1997. In The Company Of Men. Neil LaBute, $25,000.
They are among the biggest success stories of the micro-budget, do-it-yourself independent film movement of the 1990s. Four aspiring filmmakers who launched their careers with no-name casts and a fraction of one per cent of what a typical studio picture costs. In the process, they gave hope to the next generation of dreamers who, a decade later, would have unprecedented access to inexpensive digital video and editing equipment.
The result? The third highest-grossing movie this weekend was made for just $15,000 on a home video camera. It has already earned over $30 million and it hasn't even gone into wide release yet. I was reluctant to buy into the hype at first, and reluctant to add to it later, but only about a hundred and twenty-nine of my friends have asked me what I thought of Paranormal Activity, including my boss here at Five Sprockets.
One reason I'm reluctant to discuss the new smash hit is because I'm too biased. I simply don't like the mockumentary format. Especially the modern descendant of it -- the faux reality TV show. I haven't seen mockumentaries done right since Woody Allen's Zelig in 1983 and Rob Reiner's This Is Spinal Tap in 1984. Most recently, I found myself decidedly unimpressed with Cloverfield and District 9. So I'll make you a deal -- I won't dwell on my personal prejudice against the genre.
With that out of the way, I can honestly report that Paranormal Activity did manage to make a theatre full of paying moviegoers scream, ear-shatteringly so, at the simplest of cheap tricks: a door slamming. If that sounds like I'm mocking the film, I'm not. Getting a reaction from an audience is what it's all about. In fact, I have to admit, the movie did come rushing back into my head when I woke up in the middle of the night to investigate a strange noise in my un-haunted house.
The subtle, quiet, slow-build approach to suspense employed by Paranormal is far more effective than the more chaotic approach of the otherwise similarly executed DV horror mockumentary The Blair Witch Project from 1999. At the same time, going into Paranormal with expectations of The Exorcist will likely disappoint you. In comparison to my favorite movie of the year so far, Drag Me To Hell (just released on DVD last Tuesday), Paranormal is like a stroll through a carnival spook house ("Boo!"), while Sam Raimi's shocker is a ride on a demonic roller coaster.
Still, I'm happy for Oren Peli, the San Diego filmmaker behind Paranormal. When I meet people like him looking for cast and crew in exchange for food, credit and a copy of their finished film, the extreme long shot of reaching the brass ring Peli now owns makes my pessimistic side kick in. For every Smith, Rodriguez and Peli who makes it, there are hundreds, or possibly thousands, more who do nothing but waste the time of film festival judges around the world. Paranormal Activity is a pleasant reminder, though, that the next one to break out could come from my own back yard.
Dan Margules is a screenwriter and co-founder of San Diego Filmmakers. He doesn't know Oren Peli, but he began outlining his most recent spec script less than one mile from the house where Paranormal Activity was filmed. Spooky, huh? Dan's award-winning short film, Begleiter, is available in a Special Edition from Amazon.com or happy-the-dog.com. Happy Halloween!
Comments
Does it make you want to puke?
That's what I hated about Blair Witch.
Dramamine not required
I did sit further away from the screen than I did for "Blair Witch" for that very reason, but it wasn't necessary. There's a LOT of static shots. Almost half of it is the camera locked down on a tripod in the bedroom capturing what happens while they are sleeping. Those are the best scenes.
Paranormal Activity
I still haven't seen it, but I plan on doing so. Just a question, isn't the label, "mockumentary" reserved for the comedy genre? I always assumed it was and that the recent slate of "real" looking horror films were sort of their own little niche. But that's probably just me being particular.
It is nice to know that sometimes you can make a great scary film without blood. Still one of the most effective for me is the original, "The Haunting", though that's not at all the same type of film as, "Paranormal Activity", it is a master example of how to build tension.
Wikipedia says...
Yeah, I guess "mock" does imply comedy. According to Wiki, "mockumentaries" are mostly comedies but can also be "serious." (They say Reiner coined the term while promoting Tap, but in the actual film or its trailer, or maybe it was the poster, he refers to it as a "Rockumentary," so he was really mocking rock documentaries only -- a mrockumentary?) (Interestingly, Wiki also puts Orson Welles' War of the Worlds radio broadcast in the mockumentary category.)
Actually, there is another category, a subgenre, that Paranormal falls into along with Blair Witch and Cloverfield, called the "found footage" mockumentary.
Ooh...
"found footage" is the perfect name. But it does also make sense that it would fall under the mockumentary genre. I guess if I had it my way, there would be a million sub-genres. haha!
UPDATE
Saw THE FOURTH KIND this weekend. They came up with a new twist on the "found footage" mockumentary. In particular, they solved a problem that DISTRICT 9 got wrong. D9 started out as strictly faux news coverage mixed with a faux investigative reporting-type mockumentary, but gave up on that conceit halfway through and reverted to regular, scripted-type movie scenes taking place away from the faux documentary camera. 4TH KIND found a way to have the cake of "regular" movie scenes and eating it in a mockumentary by having Milla Jovovich address the camera right up front and announce that she is Milla Jovovich and she will be playing Abigail Tyler in a movie that reenacts events that really happened, some of which were recorded on video when the really happened, and others which were recreated based on interviews with the actual people. To "prove" the authenticity of the story, they show some of the actual video footage with the "real" Abigail Tyler (rumored to have been played by an uncredited Melora Walters) side-by-side with the "Hollywood" dramatization starring Jovovich. Brilliant gimmick that got lost in all the hoopla over PARANORML. A shame. Watching two different actresses play the same role side-by-side, one doing a believable "real life" version and the other deliberately doing the Hollywood "acting" version is a real good study on acting techniques. Walters (?) was so convincing that I've seen a lot of posts on message boards who have seen the movie, been confronted by other posts calling it a hoax, and continued to believe and defend that it was real. 4TH KIND also deserves to be compared to THE EXORCIST more so than does PARANORMAL.
THE FOURTH KIND is now only the third "mockumentary" I've seen that does it right (after ZELIG and SPINAL TAP).
4th kind
Will have to check it out ... also LOVE Zelig and Spinal Tap.
The Fourth Kind
That movie looked really interesting to me, and now knowing that it was shot in such an original way, I'll definitely have to check it out! I don't know though, I was pretty deeply traumatized by the abduction scene from, "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", so I may have to sleep with the lights on for a while after I see it!
Post new comment